|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 23, 2006Learning to listenRecording interviews is a good idea for a journalist. Listening to the recordings is a bad one. Two reasons. One, it is time-consuming. And it shouldn't be necessary. Your shorthand notes, reviewed & clarified quickly afterwards, should get what you need for the piece. Secondly, you discover what a lousy interviewer you are. I often end up cursing my clodhopping stupidity. Why on earth didn't I let her finish then? What a crass time to change subjects. Most scary is when I hear something significant on the recording that I failed to register at all first time round. In truth, it is not just my uselessness. Interviewing is a hard and multi-element job - keeping the questions coming, getting good notes, responding to new information, keeping the interviewee happy. So I'm going back to college to improve. Just signed up for a course called "Lousy Listeners: How to Avoid Being One" at the News University run by the Poynter Institute. It's an extraordinary offer - lots of free modules offering on-line training for journalists. Loads of other topics - news sense, cleaning copy, typography and design. They reckon they have 10,000 registered users, so someone must rate it. Les Comments
I find listening to recordings of interviews has the opposite effect: I learn from mistakes and try not to make them next time round. You should try it sometime, if you can overcome the cringe-factor of a misphrased question or a long pause. Posted by: FJ at April 3, 2006 09:02 PMPost a comment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||